Reflecting on 2024: Advancing Global Environmental Solutions with adelphi
News publ. 20. Dec 2024
Insight by Stefano De Clara
The idea behind the International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) was born in 2007, in the policy planning department of the German Foreign Office, with a view to begin fostering cooperation on international climate change issues and related foreign policy. From humble beginnings in a single email inbox, a political declaration was signed in Lisbon in the same year.
ICAP quickly began to garner attention and grow. It welcomed its first memberships from governments around the world thinking about and working on emissions trading systems (ETS). The Secretariat moved soon after to the German Federal Ministry of the Environment.
It took several forays into new territory for ICAP to find its niche in the world of carbon pricing, and climate and foreign policy more broadly. ICAP’s first steps were taken in the Kyoto era – where linking seemed a conceivable way to build a global carbon market “under the Kyoto cap” and where an organization like ICAP could facilitate and accelerate this effort. For this reason, ICAP began with a focus on any and every technical aspect of ETS, in particular the design elements that might facilitate future linkages, such as MRV, allocation, scope, and coverage.
In this period 2007-2013, the Secretariat was led by Martin Bergfelder, later succeeded by Tobias Hausotter. ICAP engaged early on with jurisdictions in the Asia-Pacific region – notably from South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Kazakhstan, and national and subnational systems in Japan. Dialogue with these regional frontrunners at the time was an important signal of true international cooperation and laid the foundations for the diverse set of members and observers that make up ICAP today.
Capacity-building and outreach on the fundamental features of ETS became a core workstream for ICAP. The first editions of the ETS Summer Academy also took place then – an initiative that continues to this day. It is now one of ICAP’s most coveted capacity building courses and over time has helped foster a global community of ETS practitioners: the ICAP alumni. Activities with China, too, commenced: a conference in 2009, two workshops in 2011 on emissions data management and monitoring in the power sector, and several special editions of the ICAP Summer Academy. After 2011, technical dialogue and knowledge-sharing beyond ICAP’s membership became increasingly important. An initial version of ICAP’s ETS Map that visualizes up-to-date information on global ETSs was launched in 2012, and a first knowledge product on carbon market oversight was published in 2013, both providing an important basis to later expand ICAP’s role as an ETS knowledge hub.
In 2013-2020, ICAP – along with the number of ETSs worldwide – grew and changed significantly, under the careful leadership of Constanze Haug and later William Acworth. More systems sprang up around the world and existing systems leapt forward, implementing reforms, and deepening their markets. Discussions and exchange on the technical elements of ETS became much more tangible, as theory turned to practice, and systems went from design to implementation. ICAP’s technical dialogue workstream thus grew in prominence.
At the same time, there arose an appetite for ETS in emerging economies. This brought with it new questions, such as how an ETS might work in jurisdictions with a regulated power sector. The realization of the practical challenges of ETS linking, with system designs strongly rooted in domestic economy considerations, also meant that previous hopes of transatlantic linking and the construction of a single, global carbon market became less feasible.
But global cooperation and exchange remained all the more relevant in a world where models of ETS implementation – with view to scope, allocation, and cap-setting – varied significantly from continent to continent. Renewed vigor in ETS’s potential as a key instrument to tackle climate change meant that those in the field relished the opportunity to learn from their peers. ICAP’s capacity-building programs and training courses also began to reflect the accumulation of practical experiences. With the introduction of ETS master classes, ICAP responded to the growing need not just for conveying ETS basics, but for opening a channel for seasoned ETS practitioners to convey their knowledge to a new generation of ETS designers, working to launch systems in the Global South. The ICAP alumni from these training courses now comprise around 1000 practitioners keeping in touch, working together, and exchanging when they meet at international climate events.
ICAP’s role as an ETS knowledge hub also began to evolve in this time. In 2014, the first edition of the annual Emissions Trading Worldwide Status Report was published. This has become a critical ETS resource and our flagship publication. In 2015, together with the World Bank’s Partnership for Market Readiness, ICAP brought together practical lessons on ETS design and implementation in an ETS Handbook, sparked by demand from policymakers around the world. We expanded our ETS news reporting, and in 2019 launched our Allowance Price Explorer.
Even as other global initiatives emerged, focusing on different aspects of carbon pricing, ICAP retained its position as a key institution with authority to speak on ETS. To this day, ICAP remains a safe and neutral forum to openly exchange on ETS design and engage in advanced technical dialogue. ICAP continues to forge collaborations with other carbon pricing initiatives around the world.
Stefano De Clara has been at the helm since 2021. Now, 15 years since ICAP’s inception, we find ourselves once again at a crossroads with ETS. Established systems from the last decade are maturing. They are largely stable, reliable, and have weathered various storms, showing resilience to financial crises, a pandemic, and now a global energy crisis. At the same time, new systems are also coming online, especially in the Latin American and Asia-Pacific regions.
The objectives of policymakers have shifted towards aligning these policy instruments with long-term, ambitious climate targets. We look towards the future and ask such questions as: how will ETS work in a net zero scenario? And what role might removals play?
The EU’s proposal for a carbon border adjustment mechanism also provides a sharp impetus for ETS and other carbon pricing instruments, which have become more diverse. Among the jurisdictions currently considering an ETS, very few are designing ‘traditional’ cap-and-trade like the first wave of systems, such as the EU, California, Quebec, New Zealand, South Korea, and others. The next generation of ETS, predominantly designed and implemented in developing countries, will feature alternative design elements, such as intensity-based caps, or will be a hybrid of various mechanisms. These systems will need to be carefully crafted to become tried and trusted climate policy tools that can help jurisdictions meet objectives in their own unique situations. The world is increasingly complex, and ETS is flexible enough to meet this complexity. Looking ahead, ICAP will continue to delve into these dynamic topics, to affirm the role of ETS in achieving net zero emissions.
The ICAP Secretariat is relentless in its mission to help governments across the globe engage with each other and create strong emissions trading systems that can spur us along the road to climate neutrality.
Thank you all for your support over the years. We look forward to the next 15.
Stefano De Clara, Head of Secretariat at ICAP