Yesterday, in a somewhat unexpected turn, ministers of 20 European states voted to successfully approve the EU Nature Restoration Law. This included the Austrian minister for the environment going against her own conservative coalition partners and voting in favour of the law. The landmark legislation aims to rapidly revitalise European ecosystems, with ambitious targets for 2030 and 2050. adelphi biodiversity experts answer four key questions on the new legislation.
Why was this law proposed in the first place? (What is the extent of biodiversity loss in the EU?)
The state of nature in Europe is deteriorating drastically. The latest report on the state of nature in the EU states that only 15% of ecosystems have a good conservation status, with 81% having poor or bad conservation status at EU level and 4% reported as unknown. Protecting what is left is therefore not enough, we also need to restore what has already been degraded.
What does the new law now require? Is this an adequate solution?
The law is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reverse biodiversity loss, restore nature, build resilience to climate change, strengthen the green economy and meet the EU's global environmental commitments. Now practical actions are required to move towards implementation. EU member states should begin by putting in place credible national nature restoration plans.
What does Austria’s controversial vote demonstrate?
Austria's controversial vote in favour of the law demonstrates the complex and often contentious nature of environmental policy within member states. It highlights the growing societal polarization and political divisions surrounding the balance between economic interests, such as agriculture and industry, and environmental conservation.
What challenges now lie ahead for its implementation?
The implementation of the law faces several challenges.
Firstly, implementation requires significant coordination and resources. This includes the need for substantial financial investment and the continued development of effective restoration techniques that can be applied across diverse ecosystems.
Additionally, there is a challenge in ensuring member state compliance and uniformity in implementation strategies. Each member state has different environmental conditions and priorities, which can lead to variations in restoration approaches and outcomes. This diversity requires a flexible yet consistent regulatory framework that can accommodate local conditions while achieving the overall goals of the law.
Another significant challenge is the integration of this law with other EU policies and priorities, such as agricultural policies and climate change objectives. There needs to be a harmonious integration that supports both biodiversity restoration and other economic and social goals, which can be complex and contentious, but is definitely feasible.
Lastly, broad public and political support is crucial for the successful implementation of such a transformative initiative. Gaining widespread support can be challenging, especially given the increasing polarization mentioned above. However, as adephi’s work on stakeholder initiatives and dialogue platforms show, it is possible to find solutions and compromise for concrete local and regional issues, including on contentious ones such as large carnivores or invasive alien species.